…and this is now
15 March 2010President Obama backs DNA test in arrestsby Josh Gerstein on 9 March 2001 at Politico
In an interview aired Saturday on America’s Most Wanted, Obama expressed strong agreement as host John Walsh extolled the virtues of collecting DNA at the time of an arrest and putting it into a single, national database.
[…]
It’s the right thing to do, Obama replied.This is where the national registry becomes so important, because what you have is individual states — they may have a database, but if they’re not sharing it with the state next door, you’ve got a guy from Illinois driving over into Indiana, and they’re not talking to each other.
There's a saying that reäctions depend upon whose ox gets gored
, but they also depend upon whose bull does the goring. Had such a programme been suggested by a high-ranking member of the previous Administration, the main-stream media would have directed considerable attention to it and to objections. There are people who will be quite silent now, or will even defend the proposal, who made a habit of furiously denouncing that previous Administration for the mere possibility that it might do such things when third parties suggested that they would.
Tags: Barack Obama, DNA, Obama, privacy, procedural rights
Leave a Reply